Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:36:58 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pmap and mtx scalability problem Message-ID: <20120424203658.GR32749@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAHM0Q_PEe18-4yfrHPujUWxsvWTUuP2-0QvJtWOh2f=igjqh=A@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120424191415.GE76983@zxy.spb.ru> <CAHM0Q_PEe18-4yfrHPujUWxsvWTUuP2-0QvJtWOh2f=igjqh=A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:27:30PM +0200, K. Macy wrote: > Known problem. There is an open disagreement about how to improve the > granularity of locking in pmap. split locking to process-specific information and global information? use lock-free lists (i see TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL in pmap_enter)? sorry for stupidity, if any.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120424203658.GR32749>