Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 01:16:37 +0900 From: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA <tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: <19990513011637Y.tomoaki@moss.nibb.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <5756.926523945@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:45:45 +0200
Message-ID: <5756.926523945@critter.freebsd.dk>
phk>
phk> >phk> > Since newconfig appears technically superior, what are the issues that
phk> >phk> >are hindering its acceptance?
phk> >phk>
phk> >phk> That we want to have no "config" at all.
phk> >
phk> >That is too short an answer.
phk>
phk> No, it is complete and to the point.
phk>
phk> >What is the definition of "config"?
phk>
phk> config(8)
phk>
phk> >Why do you want to remove it?
phk>
phk> Why should we, as a 3rd millenium OS need a static config tool ?
Newconfig is a *dynamic* configuration tool.
Replacing the old config with newconfig is sufficient for your
reason to remove config.
Why do you refuse newconfig if it is a better framework
for dynamic configuration?
--------
Tomoaki Nishiyama
e-mail:tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Department of Biological Sciences,
Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990513011637Y.tomoaki>