Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:28:57 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/p5-Audio Makefile ports/audio/p5-MusicBrainz-Client Makefile ports/audio/p5-MusicBrainz-Queries Makefile ports/audio/p5-MusicBrainz-TRM Makefile ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header Makefile ports/chinese/oicq Makefile ... Message-ID: <20051031182857.GY28443@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <1130783169.53492.29.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200510311824.j9VIOLxN071607@repoman.freebsd.org> <1130783169.53492.29.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:26:09PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 18:24 +0000, Erwin Lansing wrote: > > [list of ports elided] > > > Log: > > Let the IGNORE message make a bit more sense and change it from: > > > > ===> p5-Some-Module-0.7 Port requires perl 5.6.x or later. Install > > lang/perl5 then try again. > > > > to: > > > > ===> p5-Some-Module-0.7 requires perl 5.6.x or later. Install > > lang/perl5 then try again. > > > > Approved by: silence on -ports > > What about the implied, "no sweeping commits until 6.0 is released" > status? > This is a text-only commit and I thought consensus was that non-functional changes were OK. We really need to get the criteria of a sweeping commit written down explicitly. -erwin -- Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDZmJpqy9aWxUlaZARAvUjAKDULR/wLuuszPEj+OmlHYSVsXGmcgCgi55l 62xMfvmOVbbh9EmZxY/EtD8= =QuFO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051031182857.GY28443>