Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:40:14 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/apr Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/apr/files patch-apr-util_build_dbm.m4 patch-apr-util_configure patch-apr_hints.m4 Message-ID: <20080706194014.0a7b8c47@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20080705200240.GA88828@crodrigues.org> References: <200807041929.m64JTLxx060081@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080705081007.1dc30e3b@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <486FD18D.8000701@p6m7g8.com> <20080705200240.GA88828@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/UgZWcoBpvCFyUQQ6p=vwPFV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:02:40 +0000 Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:54:53PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > The patch in the PR actually used Tools/scripts/bump_version.pl to > > bump all those ports, but it was for *some* reason not committed, >=20 > I chose to err on the side of caution, and submit separate PR's to the > different port maintainers, since I don't like to blindly commit to > ports which I know nothing about. > I hate it when people blindly commit to APR, so I don't want to do > the same thing to other ports. In this shlib bump case the best way to go is: - update you port and test it on Tindy - rebuild all dependent port on Tindy - if you feel the need notify the maintainers of depended ports and sort out the problems with them - commit your port update - bump PORTREVISION of dependent ports. > While you submit many good ports patches, I don't really trust your > track record. If you had an actual ports commit bit, then you > would have more credibility with me to submit mega-patches which > affect many ports. If someone who knows you better can sponsor > you for a commit bit, then you can take on more of this responsibility > for yourself, instead of dumping mega-patches for committers to pick > up I am sure only the fact that English is not my native language makes me read as I do what you wrote above. What the submitter of the PR did is: - quality work (complete work) - your work (you being the maintainer of this port) So he didn't dump anything on you, au contriare. BTW, you might want to read last portmgr report. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/UgZWcoBpvCFyUQQ6p=vwPFV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhw9XQACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeXrSACePl/xQorAEBiqNlnaQfpfUMyY eKUAniEGV7edtmIEEcBFlFoOHe1Yo/72 =TFC2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UgZWcoBpvCFyUQQ6p=vwPFV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080706194014.0a7b8c47>