Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 00:27:07 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Archive <archive@cps.cmich.edu> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.org>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, daemon@bee.cs.kiev.ua, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960101002534.16319A-100000@cps201> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951231190645.21848B-100000@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I'd say that rpc.quotad would be more of a priority as far > as anyone that wants or is using FreeBSD in any ISP environment, > more so then rpc.lockd... Uhmmm not when your working with mail spools on FreeBSD and you have SunOS as a user account server. lockd is vital if nothing more than to get rid of the annoying messages. RPC.RQUOTAD can be taken from a couple other unicies if need be. (Linux/NetBSD) where RPC.LOCKD doesn't even exist anywhere. :) just my 2cents
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.960101002534.16319A-100000>