Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 09:26:06 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance... Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950612092412.217A-100000@aries> In-Reply-To: <199506112032.NAA01566@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jun 1995, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> text data bss dec hex
> 806912 57344 79536 943792 e66b0
> 510.885u 56.288s 10:23.50 90.9% 1118+1251k 1826+572io 208pf+0w
The same kernel config that took 23 to 25 minutes in 950412 and an
AMD 486DX4/100 now only takes 13 minutes with 2.0.5R and an Intel
486DX4/100. I didn't think there was that much different between the
April snapshot and 2.0.5, and certainly AMD vs. Intel won't account
for nearly double the speed. Same disk controller and drive in both
cases. However, no complaints here. :)
--
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.950612092412.217A-100000>