Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Mar 1999 15:25:41 +1100
From:      David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: GGI
Message-ID:  <19990307152541.O4858@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <199903060712.XAA66928@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 11:12:41PM -0800
References:  <36DFB421.1A845720@newsguy.com> <199903060712.XAA66928@dingo.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 11:12:41PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
>> (changed, subject, list, and cc list... it's almost a new mail! :)
>> 
>> Terry Lambert wrote:
>> > 
>> ...
>> > I can't do the work for FreeBSD until it adopts GGI, and supports ELF
>> ...
>> > 
>> > The GGI people have been looking for someone (with commit priviledges,
>> > obviously) to do a FreeBSD port, and have gone so far as to put the
>> > kernel pieces of their predominantly Linux project *in the public domain*.
>> 
>> I looked at GGI, and I liked it. If my memory doesn't fail me, Soren
>> remarked that he was not much impressed with it last he checked it.
>> 
>> What I'd like to know is if the Powers That Be of FreeBSD console
>> (Soren and Yokota?) would, present state of the code
>> notwithstanding, accept the adoption of GGI once deemed to be
>> "ready", or if there is any fundamental flaw with it that makes this
>> a hopeless propositon.
>
>Just FWIW, I was approached by one of the GGI group (actually, in the 
>employ of Creative, who are apparently going crazy right now about 
>cross-platform support) at Linuxworld.  The GGI folks seem quite fervent 
>about fixing GGI so that everyone loves it, and they see FreeBSD as 
>possibly a better place to start getting it right than Linux (which 
>already has a half-assed framebuffer driver).

Speaking of which (the Linux fb driver, not GGI), we're just adding a
driver to XFree86 4.0 that can use the Linux fb driver.  It is useful
from our point of view for getting initial unaccelerated support for
otherwise unsupported video cards.  I had a feeling that something
similar could be done for FreeBSD (using the VESA support in -current).
Is that right?  If so, is anyone interested in doing it?

David


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990307152541.O4858>