Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:16:06 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/ipfilter HISTORY Makefile bpf_filter.c ip_fil.c ipf.h ipmon.h ipt.h kmem.h mlfk_rule.c opts.h radix.c radix_ipf.h snoop.h src/contrib/ipfilter/BSD Makefile Makefile.ipsend kupgrade src/contrib/ipfilter/iplang iplang_l.l ... Message-ID: <20060824101606.414e8bf6@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20060824133628.GA54467@gvr.gvr.org> References: <200608240737.k7O7bDMC085424@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060824092002.44b90594@kan.dnsalias.net> <20060824133628.GA54467@gvr.gvr.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:36:28 +0200 Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:20:02AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:37:12 +0000 (UTC) > > Guido van Rooij <guido@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > > guido 2006-08-24 07:37:12 UTC > > > > > [..] > > > > Log: > > > MFC: ipfilter 4.1.13 > > > > This begs for a question: if ipfilter can not be updated without > > breaking the tree anymore, does it belong there in the first place? > > We could of course also get rid of the tree ;) > > -Guido Tree without ipfilter or ipfilter without tree - this is a technicality. Seriously though, I wonder how ipfilter is being tested before being checked in? Past two commits by you suggested that no testing was done at all. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7bSpQ6z1jMm+XZYRAm2aAJ0TbyTO705yRQNfwCRCe9sa6xY3QACgopyF 6zFTLfIMloTBUNAXgpXG14E= =ppaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060824101606.414e8bf6>