Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:48:01 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Automatically running /usr/tests on stable/10 branch under Jenkins Message-ID: <FBD107B5-519F-4BB5-80DD-050E9FE22ABC@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <544B46BA.4000008@freebsd.org> References: <CAG=rPVe-hCYiH5YuC%2BrzrucJbHJvEFmik0RAA%2Brq%2BXQ5K_A0Ww@mail.gmail.com> <20141024053636.GH11222@dft-labs.eu> <CAHM0Q_MOLoYGVhVOwAHfxKmMdX8bBK0Y=OoiR0TR=t3kQyYtVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVcRkCtwjNdzO2p6PuMVTLTFh7qKN=pxPVDrE0DM=R_a9w@mail.gmail.com> <81030948-E60F-4AAD-AAF1-16349607917D@gmail.com> <544B46BA.4000008@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Oct 24, 2014, at 23:44, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 10/24/14 9:45 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Oct 24, 2014, at 21:20, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:06 PM, K. Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>> (2) Creates a bootable UFS image with makefs >>>>> any chance zfs will be used as well? >>>>> >>>> Seconded. There are residual locking issues issues in ZFS. >>>> Particularly in the less exercised areas. >>>> >>> I think what would be an interesting exercise is to set up a Jenkins job to >>> build >>> and boot a bhyve VM with ZFS, and then run >>> the ZFS Test Suite, ported by Alan Somers to FreeBSD: >>> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/2014-August/000503.html >>> >>> >>> Are there any volunteers who would like to help set that up and get it >>> running >>> under Jenkins? >> I think getting tools/regression/zfs working first would be a better idea (which means that ZFS developers will need to go debug/fix the issue noted in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191574 ). I’ll go ahead and commit my fixes to head from my github fork so it runs. >> >> Alan also suggested against integrating the test suite as-is, because as he said, "Remember, don't run these tests on a production system. They WILL cause panics and deadlocks, and they may cause data loss too.” >> >> Cheers, >> -Garrett > > Wait, we want to sweep those bugs under the rug? What exactly is wrong with making a test harness that can very easily reproduce a known problem? The chances are that anyone will dive into it once the bug is easily reproducible. Sweeping bugs under the rug is not what I plan on doing; I’m marking these as expected failures, as opposed to having them continually panic a machine. Once a ZFS dev takes a look at the issue and resolves them, then the ZFS dev can remove the “bail” calls I’m adding to the testcases. Cheers, -Garrett PS FWIW the panics are recent. As I stated in the first bug, it didn’t occur on 10.0-RELEASE. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUS0eiAAoJEMZr5QU6S73ejxcIALZRkCzcpT6cfWtwDIgts2rz 5zUOJHgmExFkkijOtd7m9HEFnQQcEDQ8JJ0P/s6Fvol2/gKfRCtjd51+ip2Dj8ya g67V81qOxTFomCWo9VxWMWaBtPsowP8wwG/ZL0QkKCYQlLQITNNVu8/FsKODpIbm IKja9Bk97du9oI7+1T6L0FvkRvvk7m7MJxkzI373HKTb6+hmmt7YK9jRQ7fh5efG Qy7Ce4UUAffr6V/PHqhVvxZLiZkSa69hnY9MaAKXkVRPvIgUFTFhdYTCKqw7L8Ua vJx+zflZEzCnA2a9NC0Llcf0roNsnPV/E11F5vBzhhIY1ICx2dx2Gj99298zHPE= =pm2N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FBD107B5-519F-4BB5-80DD-050E9FE22ABC>