Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:14:49 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <199801311914.MAA20962@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <4362.886232468@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <4362.886232468@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's > >> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and > >> X.25 code have all been fixed... > > > >But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to > >real users. > > ... But appearantly not enough added value to make anybody actually > make it work. > > QED: The attic is the right place. > > And yes, personally I belive that portals & unionfs could go the same > way... Except that unionfs has been worked on consistantly, and should be left since it has an active maintainer. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801311914.MAA20962>