Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 00:37:00 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <20011027003700.A94651@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011026182323.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:23PM -0700 References: <XFMail.011026181705.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <XFMail.011026182323.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:23PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > C90 requires that time_t fit into a long according to Garrett. So? C90 is dead, long life C99. If we are going to give service to old specs, __P() needs to fully come back. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011027003700.A94651>