Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 07:55:51 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rm rm.c src/usr.sbin/chown chown.c src/usr.sbin/dev_mkdb dev_mkdb.c Message-ID: <20011216075551.B29455@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011215095930.A62613@iguana.aciri.org>; from luigi@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:59:30AM -0800 References: <200112141622.fBEGMg705939@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011215090750.A91194@citusc17.usc.edu> <20011215095930.A62613@iguana.aciri.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:59:30AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > using __P() macros), and now people complain suggesting that instead > of supplying perfectly legal (K&R and ANSI) C prototypes to 3 > functions, which do not break anything > Am i the only one who sees a contraddiction here ? Yes. Do you use string.h and stdio.h, or do you write prototypes for printf, fopen, str* in your code? Rather than add a missing prototype to foo.h, you are wanting to just add the prototype in your code. > and only increase code > portability towards possibly broken compilers, I should instead Maybe not acutally. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011216075551.B29455>