Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:53:00 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ensel Sharon <user@dhp.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: do known issues exist when snapshots used with quotas ? Message-ID: <20060314175300.GA39040@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0603141246390.8684-100000@shell.dhp.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0603141246390.8684-100000@shell.dhp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote: >=20 > I have read and re-read the recent discussions about snapshots, their > quirks, etc. >=20 > I am really getting some bad behavior out of a system using multiple > snapshots and the only recent change was the addition of user/group quotas > on that filesystem. >=20 > So ... no need for real details (unless you feel charitable enough to give > them) - just the quick question: are there any known issues / suspicions > / hunches / lore about bad things happening when snapshots are combined > with quotas ? >=20 > (running 6.0-RELEASE) Yes - I've even posted as such on this very list in the past few days, so I don't know why you're asking again. Kris --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEFwL7Wry0BWjoQKURAkZnAJ4z/ArRQezJ2dp6oexjjOkYHtw4IACeKnvf rwYhNa0G/XQz+jhgkTCxTmQ= =wmPb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060314175300.GA39040>