Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:24 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: CONFLICTS usage question Message-ID: <20040618111024.GA5660@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi folks, Is it all right if a wildcard pattern listed in CONFLICTS matches the port's package itself? Here's why I'm asking: There is a port "mail/bogofilter" that has 2 child ports, "mail/bogofilter-qdbm" and "mail/bogofilter-tdb". I'm about to add the 3rd child port for it, "russian/ru-bogofilter". Presently, the existing ports cross-list each other in CONFLICTS. It seems easier to have a single CONFLICTS setting, in the master port, that reads: CONFLICTS= bogofilter-* [a-z][a-z]-bogofilter-* Will that be legal in our ports framework? -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040618111024.GA5660>