Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Dec 2001 08:17:45 +0100
From:      "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com>
To:        "Mike Meyer" <mwm@mired.org>, "Konstantinos Konstantinidis" <kkonstan@duth.gr>, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Brad Knowles" <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Subject:   Re: A breath of fresh air..
Message-ID:  <01b801c17fb8$70c36c50$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References:   <0112071641320B.01380@stinky.akitanet.co.uk><000b01c17f42$c23ab140$0a0 0000a@atkielski.com><3C110351.4748B559@duth.gr><005001c17f6c$e60c0ef0$ 0a00000a@atkielski.com> <15377.17350.796336.801464@guru.mired.org> <006901c17f70$19a2f820$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <a05101004b8373f5230e8@[10.0.1.16]> <00d901c17fa0$9d81f800$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <a0510100bb8375314d283@[10.0.1.16]> <013e01c17fad$059cb3b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <a05101018b837656c1f03@[10.0.1.16]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad writes:

> The inner and outer diameter of the discs.

Why are these compromises?  With respect to what?

> The type and color of laser used to read the
> data.  The fact that CDs are one-sided only,
> when they could easily have been two-sided.

Same questions as above.

> No, they succeeded because they were good
> enough, and everyone in the industry got together
> and agreed that this is what they would
> push.

No, they succeeded on their own.  DVDs, for example, took off faster than
the industry anticipated--no pushing required.

> It was a fait accompli -- the market never had
> a chance to make a decision, because there was
> never any competing products that were made available
> at the time.

Phonograph records and tape competed with audio CDs.  VHS tape and laser
discs competed with DVDs.

> It still defines the analog broadcast standard,
> which even the best prosumer digital cameras
> available today have a hard time measuring up to.

You are incorrect on both points.  U-Matic is inferior to broadcast
standards, and prosumer cameras can easily meet broadcast standards, and
have been able to do so for quite some time.

> Yes, it's obviously inferior to HDTV ...

It's inferior even to Hi8.  U-Matic is really quite bad.  I've never
understood how it has survived so long.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01b801c17fb8$70c36c50$0a00000a>