Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:00:22 +0000 From: Dan Kotowski <dan.kotowski@a9development.com> To: myfreeweb <greg@unrelenting.technology> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Layerscape/QorIQ LX2160X Message-ID: <lTA1kWV3G-C1BCa0EF16x8q-YKR8dycGmQz45JrqAMwi1VKmzeR8NwYKGYUoOohz3BwPKElbUtVetcfXzI-u7Lwu7VzDCBqkCl9RXkaVsP4=@a9development.com> In-Reply-To: <31D3FA64-8296-4CA5-92A2-F7FE7C4AE981@unrelenting.technology> References: <fn58k-44ZAkuwnDdytVzV-cLaB9amYMgZWydbpR_muUcKNZwohKqn9zFxqqw_Vz8Ij8L8yOSv0XhefrcTSo_bSYSOe5_7wcjoBWl8Q2dDVM=@a9development.com> <xoiJF1ZUP3-rgbxC8ZmJGQNpsJSyK4zsAXhbLl8Ml96Da1lBPGwPqn0ANf7q-GgthPAWePSR9QDCM5vKysd_3e2aGtp-0egUXu6AW3bhLDg=@a9development.com> <CANCZdfqbd_u35toFYKr4LKkCBwnRhutM5knjnVcGR018Jfo1Vw@mail.gmail.com> <664db38a87ea8803be72af9738534994@unrelenting.technology> <b5105ce888b7a91eff50ec9118a910a8@unrelenting.technology> <8951311F-77F7-40B8-AEA0-F8CBCB1A05DE@yahoo.com> <4ad62e6669044f82e71a9d86fd493356@unrelenting.technology> <ShdSNL8XDgj0KtPR4v8nn1ohjVssrnoUQGwNL-gHOpylio7Eo5J_WjA2Ko9YjV5md64MeFz017Ts01KUnpJa3Xpw4y_PncL4e5cfUcotRWM=@a9development.com> <31D3FA64-8296-4CA5-92A2-F7FE7C4AE981@unrelenting.technology>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I've sent a link to a known firmware build before: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yXSS1O1U8CmtwaIPfxNDkzhAClJGvErK/vie= w > > > Have you tried it? Any difference in FreeBSD/NetBSD, with NVMe? > > > > I decided to go back to the UEFI sources and have found some difference= s that I think need to be reconciled before moving forward. That said, I'm = not an ACPI wizard by any means - for me it's low-level mage spells at best= ... > > In https://github.com/SolidRun/edk2-platforms we have 2 different branc= hes that SolidRun seems to use: > > > > 1. LSDK-19.09-sr > > 2. master-lx2160a > > > > I've been building from the latter branch, but found some significant d= ifferences in the former that I think may be important to merge in. > > To me it seems like 19.09 is just outdated and doesn't have any benefits.= Ask the solidrun people to be sure. > > Either way, nothing here would fix the interrupt bug. It's our bug since = NetBSD works fine :( Any thoughts on the "Poll mode" comment below from the dts? We're still not= seeing any of the PHYs in either BSD. ``` &emdio1 { rgmii_phy1: ethernet-phy@1 { /* AR8035 PHY - "compatible" property not strictly needed */ compatible =3D "ethernet-phy-id004d.d072"; reg =3D <0x1>; /* Poll mode - no "interrupts" property defined */ }; }; ```
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lTA1kWV3G-C1BCa0EF16x8q-YKR8dycGmQz45JrqAMwi1VKmzeR8NwYKGYUoOohz3BwPKElbUtVetcfXzI-u7Lwu7VzDCBqkCl9RXkaVsP4=>