Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:48:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199136] [if_tap] Added down_on_close sysctl variable to tap(4) Message-ID: <bug-199136-2472-DsvsCmeuiw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199136-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199136-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199136 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open CC| |glebius@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> --- I'm strongly against the sysctl, and reasons are same as before. Sysctl knob is global. You can make it per-vnet, but your patch lacks that. You could even make it per-interface, but that would require quite a lot of extra code. The IFF_LINK flag is a lesser patch, and immediately gives you a per-interface configuration granularity, which of course implies per-vnet. Setting flag in rc.conf requires same efforts as putting a line in sysctl.conf. Changing the default is different question, and should be discussed separately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199136-2472-DsvsCmeuiw>