Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:34:21 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, eugen@kuzbass.ru, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>, Marian Hettwer <mh@kernel32.de> Subject: Re: lagg(4) and failover Message-ID: <1228480461.2805.469.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20080812120307.GD64458@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <E1KSs4q-000AVN-4d@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <cf39e420dc78dbab1f2848a24cedfc34@localhost> <20080812120307.GD64458@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-7zVPQTw3Vkq94LWlaKHr Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:03 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >Thats unfortunate... >=20 > I tend to agree. >=20 > >bonding in Linux is capable of doing this and solaris too. >=20 Well ... name a price for the development; HA L1/L2 is a feature the community would gladly sponsor the development of. Also, Peter, you should put a page up on the FreeBSD wiki with some of those multi-catalyst LACP IOS config examples. =20 Maybe write an article for BSDMag. I always just counted that idea out (LACP against two switches) since LACP doesn't have any inter-component transport protocol a la pfsync(4). But if the backplanes of Cat 37xx`s can be merged at a lower level, then then yea, fuck. Lets have it. ~BAS=20 P.S., in my experience, system level redundancy/HA with a load balancer is almost always less expensive then excessive component-level redundancy/ha (RAID Disk, RAID RAM, Dual Power Supplies, Dual Backplanes...) > It shouldn't be too difficult to create something that behaves > functionally similarly to Slowaris ipmpd (and with marginally more > effort, you could create something that could be configured to behave > sensibly). --=20 Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. --=-7zVPQTw3Vkq94LWlaKHr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk5H80ACgkQCne6BNDQ+R9sWwCdEs4oicCy15n+VrJ+uFEqbIYz xXMAmwTAUPy6BTLDWKi73gi3fzbDWYQm =SypL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7zVPQTw3Vkq94LWlaKHr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1228480461.2805.469.camel>