Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 16:54:08 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: .s -> .S filename change in /sys Message-ID: <20000509235408.2DD421CE5@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Message from Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> of "Wed, 10 May 2000 00:46:57 BST." <200005092346.AAA30494@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Somers wrote:
> > John Baldwin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 09-May-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > I would like to rename the extension of all the .s files in /sys that n
eed
> > > > pre-processing to .S. There are two reasons for this.
> > >
> > > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > BTW; this is the file counts of .s vs .S look like:
> >
> > ashburton[3:44pm]~src-104# find . -name '*.[sS]' > /tmp/s
> > ashburton[3:45pm]~src-105# egrep '\.s$' /tmp/s | wc -l
> > 96
> > ashburton[3:45pm]~src-106# egrep '\.S$' /tmp/s | wc -l
> > 208
> >
> > Repo copying all these .s files to .S will add about 1.7MB to the repo.
> >
> > I personally would prefer to have everything *.S, but remember that it
> > doesn't come for free.
>
> Can't they be repo-moved for free ? Would doing that actually do any
> damage (surely both cvs and cvsup'll just delete the .s and create the
> .S) ? Am I being naive ?
No, because if you 'cvs checkout -r RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE src' you will
end up with something that does not build, because the Makefiles etc will
refer to *.s, not *.S.
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000509235408.2DD421CE5>