Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      03 Aug 2000 21:59:01 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To:        dg@root.com
Cc:        jgarman@wedgie.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 4.1-ISO
Message-ID:  <xzpzomui0ai.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: David Greenman's message of "Wed, 02 Aug 2000 22:02:02 -0700"
References:  <200008030502.WAA23582@implode.root.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Greenman <dg@root.com> writes:
>    Lightning is fairly small and much of its traffic defaults through
> AboveNet.

One of the ISPs I use has a direct circuit to AboveNet, the other goes
through two hops at TeleGlobe, so I'm pretty happy with latency and
throughput, but I'm not too happy about supporting AboveNet in any
way, if what's been said about their competitive practices (MAPS vs.
ORBS) is true.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzomui0ai.fsf>