Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:34:43 +0900
From:      Hiroharu Tamaru <tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries
Message-ID:  <sa61vm97zyk.wl%tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20090914174309.GF37291@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <sa6ws9ba7pc.wl%tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
References:  <20090914174309.GF37291@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

At Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:43:09 -0700, Chris Cowart wrote:
> We have a system which makes heavy use of published arp entries. I know
> the arp code has been significantly overhauled in 8, but it looks like
> this functionality is now broken.
> 
> $ arp -s 172.16.132.100 00:0c:29:16:bd:49 pub
> 
> If I watch tcpdump on the interface, I see arp requests come in but no
> replies are sent. This is a clean build with no firewalls enabled.

Just for another datapoint, I see the same symptom.
I am currently running ports/net-mgmt/choparp as a workaround.

At Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:13:51 +0900, Hiroharu Tamaru wrote:
> Subject: proxy arp on 8.0-current?
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:13:51 +0900
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
>
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to setup an proxy arp on a dual homed host.
> 
> I noticed that I cannot set it up on 8.0-current the same way as I
> could on 6.2; hence the question: have the setup procedure changed
> recently (when the arp table was separated from the routing table,
> maybe?)?  My 8.0-current is from 200902 snapshot.
> 
> Here is a simple demonstration using two single-interfaced hosts:
> 
> setup:
> host6.2# ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.0.1/24
> host6.2# arp -s 192.168.0.11 auto pub
> host6.2# arp -an | grep permanent
> ? (192.168.0.1) at 00:16:d3:xx:xx:xx on em0 permanent [ethernet]
> ? (192.168.0.11) at 00:16:d3:xx:xx:xx on em0 permanent published [ethernet]
> host6.2# tcpdump -np arp
> 
> host8.0# ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.0.2/24
> host8.0# arp -s 192.168.0.12 auto pub
> host8.0# arp -an | grep permanent
> ? (192.168.0.2) at 00:0c:29:xx:xx:xx on em0 permanent [ethernet]
> ? (192.168.0.12) at 00:0c:29:xx:xx:xx on em0 permanent published [ethernet]
> host8.0# tcpdump -np arp
> 
> then, I do:
> host6.2# arp -d 192.168.0.2;  ping -c 1 192.168.0.2
> host6.2# arp -d 192.168.0.12; ping -c 1 192.168.0.12
> host8.0# arp -d 192.168.0.1;  ping -c 1 192.168.0.1
> host8.0# arp -d 192.168.0.11; ping -c 1 192.168.0.11
> 
> I am not caring about 'arp -d' errors (cannot locate) nor ping not
> responding (for proxied addresses).  I just cared about arp requests and
> replys for now.  The output of tcpdump on both sides are like this:
> 
>  arp who-has 192.168.0.2 tell 192.168.0.1
>  arp reply 192.168.0.2 is-at 00:0c:29:xx:xx:xx
> 
>  arp who-has 192.168.0.12 tell 192.168.0.1
> ---->no reply
> 
>  arp who-has 192.168.0.1 tell 192.168.0.2
>  arp reply 192.168.0.1 is-at 00:16:d3:xx:xx:xx
> 
>  arp who-has 192.168.0.11 tell 192.168.0.2
>  arp reply 192.168.0.11 is-at 00:16:d3:xx:xx:xx
> 
> As you can see from the above,
> 'arp -s 192.168.0.12 auto pub' on 8.0-current host
> seems not to be producing proxy arp's.
> 
> What am I missing?
> 
> Thanks.
> -- 
> Hiroharu Tamaru



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?sa61vm97zyk.wl%tamaru>