Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:37:19 -0500 From: Dave Glowacki <dglo@ssec.wisc.edu> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Message-ID: <200006231437.JAA05529@hyde.ssec.wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:59:14 %2B0900." <3952EEA2.BC2EF0B6@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > > Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who > > recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything. > > Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to > > change. :) > > OCVS? (Or was it OVCS? I can never recall...) I know of at least 4 open source successors to CVS: Eivind Eklund's OVCS http://www.OpenVCS.org/ Josh MacDonald's PRCS http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jmacd/prcs.html Jonathan Shapiro's DCMS http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/dcms-dev/ tigris.org's Subversion http://subversion.tigris.org/ Of these, PRCS the only one out of the design phase, though it doesn't yet have a client-server mode. Oh yeah, there's Bitkeeper too, but it's not really open source... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006231437.JAA05529>