Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 15:36:31 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Pawel Tyll <ptyll@nitronet.pl> Subject: Re: IPFW eXtended tables [Was: Re: IPFW tables, dummynet and IPv6] Message-ID: <A4B03A39-316D-44AF-9015-65BE885A04D8@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <4EF73A4A.3050902@FreeBSD.org> References: <1674097252.20111218125051@nitronet.pl> <4EEDD566.8020609@FreeBSD.org> <20111220163355.GA87584@DataIX.net> <4EF73A4A.3050902@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25. Dec 2011, at 14:59 , Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Final patch version now uses single IP_FW3 socket option.
> Together with other changes this makes me think such changes should be
> reviewed by a wider number of people. If there are no
> objections/comments I plan to commit this on tuesday.
Aehm if you want review by a larger number of people and maybe some testing,
2 days, especially over the holiday season is far from reasonable.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A4B03A39-316D-44AF-9015-65BE885A04D8>