Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 11:13:21 +0300 (EET DST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Cc: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961017110856.17620C-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <199610161540.KAA27811@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Oct 1996, Joe Greco wrote: > > >> I generally agree with your approach. However I would suggest that not > > >> 2.1.5, but 2.1.x is the appropriate one for production. > > > > My point here is that, although few changes have been made, we should > > encourage people to upgrade from 2.1.5R to the present "-stable". > > I can see arguments both ways. I do not disagree with the idea, but > for people to upgrade from 2.1.5R to 2.1.6R with a very small delta > (particularly if it consists of changes that do not affect them) may > not make sense. I do not particularly care, I simply want to see some > variant of this "well tested" branch to stay around until there is a > 2.2 based "well tested" branch. Unless ports (that do not depend on some fancy kernel internal present only in -current) are also brought over, tcl is imported, etc. I personally see very little idea in making 2.1.6. The anti-syn-attack pacthes and other goodies just aren't enough. > [snip] > > >But... when it comes right down to it, I don't care too much about how > > >it's numbered, I just want to see something happen. :-) > > > > I do think that numbering has some impact on the perception that the public > > has of the product. > > Sure it does, but I do not want to see FreeBSD inventing numbering schemes > simply to impress the public. Are we really going through something *MAJOR* that we must have a greate change in the version number? Or is it just lkike Linux - so many new features have been added - lets jump to 2.0? Sander > > ... JG >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.961017110856.17620C-100000>