Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:17:18 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, lists@eitanadler.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture Message-ID: <432EFDBB-9CE8-480A-8B6A-8171BA9F4A83@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <201304011331.r31DVCJw052856@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201304011331.r31DVCJw052856@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 1, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> > Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:48:08 -0400 > Subject: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture > To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers = <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> >=20 > should drop support for the i386 architecture for 10.0 to tier 2 > and replace it with the ARM architecture as Tier 1. >=20 > don't care for i386, don't use it anymore. >=20 > Is ARM really ready for tier 1? > Including the ports infrastructure? > Installation images? It is certainly getting close, at least for the newer armv6+ boards. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?432EFDBB-9CE8-480A-8B6A-8171BA9F4A83>