Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:23:23 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Paul Murphy <pnmurphy@cogeco.ca>, Heinrich Rebehn <rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro? Message-ID: <200303201423.27103.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <3E79B877.70106@liwing.de> References: <3E797D1F.8070807@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20030320123818.GA15027@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3E79B877.70106@liwing.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thursday 20 March 2003 13:47, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Isn't the Rago Pro a different card than the Rage 128 Pro? > > Sometimes, sometimes not ... Definitely different, and not just sometimes. :) The RagePro chipset is much older than the Rage 128 Pro. -- Regards, Michael Nottebrock [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+ecDPXhc68WspdLARAvXpAKCKTP0lLHt/PszSO0IogO6Aht6hPwCfeeNG ocuaWaTHRYZy99j6AXTFKjM= =lTCY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303201423.27103.michaelnottebrock>