Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:20:08 +0200 From: "Frank Behrens" <frank@pinky.sax.de> To: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My experience with cpufreq in -STABLE Message-ID: <200504041919.j34JJUTB038767@pinky.frank-behrens.de> In-Reply-To: <20050404171735.GR2298@poupinou.org> References: <200504041645.j34Gj2ow002999@pinky.frank-behrens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> wrote on 4 Apr 2005 19:17: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:45:17PM +0200, Frank Behrens wrote: > > 3. I want to ask the question: Are there are other, more > > sophisticated programs to control the current cpu frequency? > > You may start looking at src/usr.sbin/powerd in -current, and improve it > a bit? The actual algorithm used in powerd may need some rework IMHO. Thanks for this hint. powerd compiles on -stable immediately without warnings. It is very interesting for me to see, that the base structure of powerd is nearly the same as I wrote. :-) So I will give it a try. Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504041919.j34JJUTB038767>