Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:29:28 +0200
From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>, Jim Mock <jim@freebsd.org>, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HARDWARE.TXT vs. {i386,alpha}/RELNOTES.TXT
Message-ID: <20000830192928.A95505@mithrandr.moria.org>
In-Reply-To: <200008301716.e7UHGq093351@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>; from bmah@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:16:52AM -0700
References: <200008291834.e7TIYFm20218@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20000829204112.A5240@luna.osd.bsdi.com> <20000830154508.A62946@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <200008301716.e7UHGq093351@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed 2000-08-30 (10:16), Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 08:41:12PM -0700, Jim Mock wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 at 11:34:15 -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > > > Could someone explain to this newbie why we maintain separate lists
> > > > of supported hardware in HARDWARE.TXT vs. {i386,alpha}/RELNOTES.TXT?
> > >
> > > I've never been able to figure this out either.
> >
> > Me either (certainly predates me). Feel free to nuke it.
>
> So, it seems like what we ought to do is to sync up HARDWARE.TXT with
> RELNOTES.TXT (to make sure there's one consistent list), and then
> replace the hardware lists in RELNOTES.TXT with pointers to
> HARDWARE.TXT. Anyone we need to ask about this?
I've noticed this before too. My only suggestion is that we should
continue to document _new_ support in RELNOTES.
Neil
--
Neil Blakey-Milner
Sunesi Clinical Systems
nbm@mithrandr.moria.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000830192928.A95505>