Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 11:55:25 -0600 From: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <199704091755.LAA08240@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 10:35:09 CDT." <199704091535.KAA01745@compound.east.sun.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi, > I beg to differ. It is the only set supporting SDRAM! It seems one's > choice is between a fast small memory system and a slow large memory > one. An unpleasant tradeoff, to be sure, but I would expect anyone > who intends not to add more than 64MB RAM to the current generation > motherboard to prefer the SDRAM support. the numbers I've seen for SDRAM suggest there isn't much gained in REAL WORLD situations. Can't remember the specifics but do remember thinking at the time that I apparently wasn't missing anything.. just my 2cents worth... -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSDhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704091755.LAA08240>