Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:26:37 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: additional ifreq accessors? Message-ID: <62336.1586280397@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20200407172151.GB72584@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20200407172151.GB72584@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <20200407172151.GB72584@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>, Brooks Dav= is writes: >My question for the lists is: should we adopt the >more-technically-correct accessors in FreeBSD or stick with >slightly-cheaper and more conventional aliasing approach[0]? The accessors buys us much more code-isolation, so that would be my vote. -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62336.1586280397>