Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:10:59 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ? Message-ID: <faa41aee-67a5-9361-6250-efff88c9a36c@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <5b9baa6a-66ee-549d-a3e9-f6ea4e6e5016@grosbein.net> References: <20211126160454.3eb827365a02103169ab9adc@bidouilliste.com> <5b9baa6a-66ee-549d-a3e9-f6ea4e6e5016@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
26.11.2021 22:59, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > sc(4) is still better quality for BIOS-based systems or EFI-based with CSM legacy mode working. > sc(4) is better to such an extent FreeBSD's unusable with vt(4) for some fresh systems being sold > but boots and works fine with sc(4). An example with many people complaining: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230172 Sorry, not completly "unusable" (it seems manual work-around exists) but without knowledge of obscure work-around one cannot use the hardware with vt(4) and FreeBSD versions 11.2+ (11.1-RELEASE was last one working out of the box).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?faa41aee-67a5-9361-6250-efff88c9a36c>