Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 08:58:36 -0800 From: John Irwin <jdi@ninthwave.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wanton Atticizing is bad Message-ID: <36B9D1BC.D2409BB5@ninthwave.com> References: <199812292011.EAA82011@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Eric J. Schwertfeger" wrote:
> > There's two areas that IPFILTER seems to work better than IPFW, and both
> > are NAT-related.
>
> I've been discussing this with various folks.
>
> What I see as the "best" solution to overcome the problem of a poorly
> maintained (and old) copy in the tree is to make a port out of it and
> remove the bulk of the code from the tree.
Any chance of this happening (preferrably in 3.0-stable)? I need to run the
newest
version of IPFilter, and it's a bitch trying to hack out the old/hack in the new.
Thanks,
-- John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36B9D1BC.D2409BB5>