Date: 17 Jul 1998 12:13:30 +0200 From: smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk> Cc: ben@rosengart.com, "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make release fails because kernel is too large Message-ID: <rx4emvk9451.fsf@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com> In-Reply-To: Dom Mitchell's message of Thu, 16 Jul 1998 22:53:11 %2B0100 References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980716170421.22831B-100000@echonyc.com> <E0ywvxg-0000x2-00.qmail@myrddin.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk> writes: > Snob Art Genre <benedict@echonyc.com> writes: > > On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > > What about using 1.68 or 1.72 MB floppies? > > I think that this would drastically reduce the amount of > > FreeBSD-friendly hardware out there. > Yes, but don't Microsoft do similiar sorts of things with the Win95 > boot floppies? I know that doesn't grant a right to do so by God, but > it's a fairly clear idea of how much hardware *does* support it. I suggest we revise Goodwin's Law to cover Microsoft and Bill Gates. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?rx4emvk9451.fsf>