Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Dec 1996 17:03:55 -0800 (PST)
From:      Jonathan Mini <j_mini@efn.org>
To:        "Pedro Giffuni S." <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: status of windows, dos and svr4 emulation
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.95.961205170108.4332C-100000@garcia.efn.org>
In-Reply-To: <32A7693D.42F2@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Pedro Giffuni S. wrote:


 
> FreeBSD distinguishes between Linux´s ELF and fbsd´s ELF (never have
> seen one of those though) but I don´t know if there´s an additional tag
> in FBSD´s ELF´s for that purpose. I always run a.out´s (I use 2.1.5), is
> there any particular advantage in using ELF?

As far as I know, the only advantage behind ELFs is proper implementation
of shared libs and other such resources. But FreeBSD's a.out's are more
than capable of handling such beasties. That is one of the principle
reasons why it has taken FreeBSD "so long" to implement elf. 
  Linix is proud of thier ELFs, I have never understood why. I have heard
that thier a.outs are not as robust, but I can't confirm it. 

                                Jon Mini, j_mini@efn.org, mini@4j.lane.edu
                                                    GAMMA Development Team
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I think I can, I think I can, I think I can...."
little.blue.engine:Reality Protection Fault. (core dumped)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.95.961205170108.4332C-100000>