Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:02:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205852] Be nicer about multiple sqlalchemy ports Message-ID: <bug-205852-13-AWv8M3AJaM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205852 --- Comment #5 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #4) > Something like this may work for both sqlalchemy and sqlalchemy08 > (but the package builders will keep using sqlalchemy): Yes, that's an alternative -- for the particular case of sqlalchemy. But something more comprehensive may be in order. So far we've been resolving s= uch cases with USES-foo, but it may not be warranted in all cases. > There may be side effects of overwriting PKG_INFO Globally? Yes. Certainly a full test-run would be needed... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205852-13-AWv8M3AJaM>