Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 21:37:20 +0800 (CST) From: Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/81199: handbook/ipfw does not mention gateway_enable in rc.conf Message-ID: <200505181337.j4IDbKTm011637@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> Resent-Message-ID: <200505181340.j4IDe2F4004849@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 81199 >Category: docs >Synopsis: handbook/ipfw does not mention gateway_enable in rc.conf >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed May 18 13:40:01 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Rong-En Fan >Release: FreeBSD 5.4 i386 >Organization: NTU CSIE >Environment: >Description: Handbook 24.5 and 24.6 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipf.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html in 24.6, which contains ipfw/natd, and it does not explicitly mention gateway_enable="YES" if you are going to use private ip. While 24.5.3 (section about ipf) does it. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Add similar things in 24.5.3 to 24.6.3. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505181337.j4IDbKTm011637>