Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:18:53 -0500
From:      "Ken Menzel" <kenm@icarz.com>
To:        "Vivek Khera" <khera@kciLink.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d depend on each other
Message-ID:  <030001c09121$aa8d2920$711663cf@icarz.com>
References:  <Pine.A41.4.21.0102070034180.23808-100000@katahdin.bmv.state.me.us><3A80EEF6.1BC0B35A@fernuni-hagen.de> <14977.27303.940214.219475@onceler.kciLink.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I personally think that any port that installs an init script that
> alters the ldconfig path should prefix with 00 or some such, like
> 00-mysql-client.sh.  I do this on my systems that use mod_perl
inside
> apache since I almost always also use DBI with mysql in mod_perl.
Hi Vivek,
   You run the ldconfig command is that startup scripts?  Or do you
set the ldconfig variable in /etc/rc.conf?  If you have a preference
for one over the other why?  Also same questions stand about why we
dont use ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf, ummm I was curious because the
"ports" install of mysql does not seem to do anything with ldconfig.
I am not sure what other ports do,  but maybe I should be asking this
question in the ports list,  not sure where it belongs!
Thanks  Ken



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?030001c09121$aa8d2920$711663cf>