Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 20:15:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: bad@uhf.wireless.net (Bernie Doehner) Cc: tom@inna.net, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Neat BT848/fxtv problem Message-ID: <199706101815.UAA06874@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970610130505.2563A-100000@uhf.wdc.net> from "Bernie Doehner" at Jun 10, 97 01:05:27 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > to > > > > #define SYNC_LEVEL (BT848_ADC_RESERVED | BT848_ADC_SYNC_T) > > > > BT848_ADC_CRUSH didn't seem to make much of a difference here though (when > receiving of an antenna, so I left it in). certainly BT848_ADC_SYNC_T is more important because it allows to sync better. I think some AGC decisions (e.g. the level right after sync pulses etc.) are taken assuming the frame is properly synchronized, so if you lose sync and leave BT848_ADC_CRUSH on, you might run into the fading problem which were mentioned. Luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706101815.UAA06874>