Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:06:34 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /sys/conf is getting unwieldy to handle... Message-ID: <2653.1096887994@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:40:56 %2B0200." <200410041241.04608.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200410041241.04608.max@love2party.net>, Max Laier writes: >Yes, this would create something I liked to call "meta-options" in former=20 >discussions on this topic. > >Yet, there is a bit more to it. It would (imo) also involve some thinking=20 >about the way we build modules (there is a TODO item "revised kld build=20 >infrastructure" that seems to cover that part) and maybe also a bit of=20 >reorganization/coalescence of the opt_*.h include mechanism ... > >I have thought about this a bit already, so I'd like to help (if my babblin= >g=20 >makes sense to you ;) Well, I didn't really plan to get involved in this apart from using it, this was merely an attempt to encourage people with more spare time than me to pick up the ball. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2653.1096887994>