Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:57:10 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: deorbiting /usr/lib/libstand.a, moving to sysboot Message-ID: <23C4A573-05A7-4D76-9179-19169ECAB570@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrvD04cL3A1J3nKZ2uFNNkOrcVnMvobdoyXkRGx8VK8Vg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 9 Oct 2017, at 07:45, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > I'd like to deorbit /usr/lib/stand.a and /usr/include/stand.h. These are > really parts of the boot loader with an unstable API and shouldn't be > installed into the system. It's really a private library to the boot loader. Though I completely agree with this, I am still interested in the historical reasons for separating out this library for general userland consumption. Were there any other parts of world that happened to use libstand? -Dimitry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCWducVgAKCRCwXqMKLiCW ox2pAJ9Iedi/kIROJzc1jKxcOY5VVBOz8wCg+VUaJv4QR/rec1fJciep8WUNSpQ= =Iysb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23C4A573-05A7-4D76-9179-19169ECAB570>