Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@www.hotjobs.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808201310190.237-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980820124621.305D-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Alfred Perlstein wrote: [...] > an even 16 seconds (linux) [Redhat 5.1] (dunno the opts) > > this is on the same 100mbit segment. > i'm using NFS over TCP and linux is using UDP (i think) > both to the same Solaris 5.6 box. > > the FreeBSD box is my tuning (just the mount opts listed above), the > redhat box has also been tuned by a linux user. This is a poor comparison, and won't get you very far IMO. If you want to compare Linux to FreeBSD, compare them on equal ground (i.e.: 2.0.xx to -STABLE, and 2.[1,2].xx to -CURRENT). - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9808201310190.237-100000>