Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:50:18 +0300 From: Nikolay Pavlov <quetzal@zone3000.net> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon Message-ID: <20061011195018.GA15554@zone3000.net> In-Reply-To: <%2B2VE7LPdEU@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> <20061011102106.GY1594@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <%2B2VE7LPdEU@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wednesday, 11 October 2006 at 18:08:02 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Jeremie Le Hen schrieb:, > > > Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it > > is still used in many places because of its stability and performance. > > agreed. > > > Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELENG_4_11's EoL once > > more ? > > I second this. > > I know a half dozend installation, that must rum RELENG_4_11, > because FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x simply don't boot on that servers any more. > There is alot of hardware where an updated don't run on. > > kind regards Dirk > I don't want to bother somebody, but it would be realy cool if we can use RELENG_4 with security updates support for the next year. FreeBSD-4.11 is the best choice for old hardware like our PentiumII 400Mhz router. It's just works. Thats all. In any case thanks for all security officers for they work.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061011195018.GA15554>