Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:07 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of register && K&R function decl. Message-ID: <3CD0E3F7.5164B5EF@mindspring.com> References: <20020501193212.C9763-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20020502001646.GL98487@elvis.mu.org> <xzpk7qno08f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> writes: > > Please don't ansify functions, some people prefer the old style. > > Last time this came up, the consensus was that ANSIfication was > permitted. I thought that the consensus was to "vote with NetBSD and OpenBSD" on a case-by-case basis to reduce the gratuitous diffs? I know the consensus was to get rid of __P, so that header declarations were prototypes. But that doesn't really translate to changing all the code everywhere to use prototypes in actual function declarations. If NetBSD and OpenBSD have changed it, then as long as the changes are whitespace equal to them, I personally would have no problem with it; K&R compilation was already broken when __P() was ripped out. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CD0E3F7.5164B5EF>