Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 17:00:15 -0500 From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> To: jkb <jkb@best.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs. the rest of the world, poor OS comparison on web page Message-ID: <19971013170015.39984@right.PCS> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971013143025.23349D-100000@shell6.ba.best.com>; from jkb on Oct 10, 1997 at 02:36:36PM -0700 References: <17167.876767152@time.cdrom.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971013143025.23349D-100000@shell6.ba.best.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 10, 1997 at 02:36:36PM -0700, jkb wrote: > I wonder if we should cc: linuxrx@www.falconweb.com and tell them > that FreeBSD does support "Multiple CPU's" and pthreads. And the part > about "most used for low-end workstation": Actually, I thought that FBSD was used more for high-end workstations, leaving the low-end segment to Linux. This would explain why FBSD appears to have more support for high-end devices. :-\ Then again, I wouldn't spend too much time on it, not for a page that touts "64-bits" as part of the OS. I also note that they don't list NetBSD, which would obviously shame Linux when it comes to the "# of platforms" category. -- Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971013170015.39984>