Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:59:09 -0800 From: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org> To: Nyteckjobs@aol.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tedm@toybox.placo.com Subject: Re: (no subject) Message-ID: <20011129115909.A75251@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <14e.4d05ff7.29371325@aol.com>; from Nyteckjobs@aol.com on Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:27:17PM -0500 References: <14e.4d05ff7.29371325@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The concept that "netgraph hooks" are a "leg up" on say, ETs drivers that > have integrated bandwidth management and prioritization, WAN bridging > support, load balancing and a probably 25% performance advantage is a bit > entertaining. Unless you need to do some convoluted encapsulation netgraph > is, aside from being appallingly non-standard to anything else in the market, > not much of an "advantage", and its a poster child for the trade off of > "flexibility" versus performance. > > Lets face it. If you were going to sit down and design an interface for frame > relay, multi-protocol support, etc, you'd have to be smoking something pretty > strong to come up with netgraph. But its free and there is source, so it > must be great! Dennis, if you are going to continue trolling FreeBSD mailing lists from your AOL account, you should really consider choosing a name that does not coincide with what we already know or can easily find out about you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011129115909.A75251>