Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 15:44:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: dmaddox@scsn.net Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sio0 flag 0x20000 Message-ID: <199805282044.PAA02201@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <19980528160640.A747@scsn.net> (dmaddox@scsn.net) References: <199805281812.NAA01183@detlev.UUCP> <19980528160640.A747@scsn.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Is sio0 flag 0x20000 (enable 16550A features) in proper functioning >> order? I enabled it on a whim, and got strange effects in ppp (ie, >> login works fine, but during LQR negotiations, the other side doesn't >> see config-req or config-ack). Disabled it in bootconfig, and all is >> well. >> The probe reports the chip as a 16550A... is that reliable? > The 0x20000 flag is for use with 16>6<50s, not 16550s... > During the brief time when it was enabled by default, it caused problems > with my 16550A-clone serial ports, but it works fine for the 16650-based > LavaPort I have... Memo to myself: check into treatment for dyslexia. Thanks! Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805282044.PAA02201>