Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:27:12 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen@FreeBSD.org>, threads@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libthr shared locks Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1602161224250.19440@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20160216113222.GY91220@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20151223172528.GT3625@kib.kiev.ua> <56BE69B8.9020808@FreeBSD.org> <56C24586.9050906@FreeBSD.org> <20160216113222.GY91220@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:39:18PM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote: >> My only comment on kern_umtx.c is, why are the permission checks compiled out? > > Assume that we changed the ABI of libthr and shared locks do not require > an offpage. How are you coming with that? I thought maybe you were going to think about making the synch types structs, but not actually changing the implementation (yet). -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1602161224250.19440>