Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:44:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Ted Lindgreen <ted@tednet.nl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent change in less(1) Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708100843090.28927@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <200708100831.l7A8VmoA009412@omval.tednet.nl> References: <200708100831.l7A8VmoA009412@omval.tednet.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
> [Quoting Daniel Eischen, on Aug 7, 15:41, in "Re: Recent change in ..."]
> ....
>>> If so I have a question: how to obtain the former behaviour of the -e
>>> switch, i.e. quit when EOF is hit twice always (thus whether or not
>>> when the file happens to fit on a single page)?
>>
>> Perhaps:
>>
>> if (less_is_more) {
>> no_init = TRUE;
>> if (get_quit_at_eof())
>> quit_if_one_screen = TRUE;
>> }
>
> Daniel, are you going to check this fix in?
>
> (Or must we live with broken "-e" functionality in future, in which
> case at least the man-page should be updated to reflect the new
> behaviour IMHO).
I don't know. Does it work the way it is suppose to with this
patch?
--
DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0708100843090.28927>