Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 12:50:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@dimaga.com> To: Jimbo Bahooli <moke@fools.ecp.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipnat + natd Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970409124850.4166B-100000@sol.dimaga.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970408174829.218A-100000@fools.ecp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Jimbo Bahooli wrote: > I have tried both ipnat (ipfilter) and natd (from www.srv.net/~cmott) for > ip aliasing purposes. Both have worked somewhat to a degree. However, > both went extremely slowly, 20bytes/sec was about averaged for any host > behind me. Also tcpdump would spit out ip reassembly time exceeded > messages. I am wondering if anyone else has had this problem. The connect > to the internet is 28.8 ppp, and ethernet for the aliased hosts. The > kernel is 2.2-STABLE and the newest ipfilter and natd are being used. This is strange. I'm running the same aliasing code as natd (using user-land PPP) and get about 3KB/s from aliased hosts. What kind of CPU power have you got? (I'm aliasing about 20 hosts on a Pentium 150, which is also running as a file/printer/CPU-server, without any noticable load) Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970409124850.4166B-100000>