Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:57:34 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Amanda backups, or dump(8) broken? Message-ID: <20030304115734.A23126@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20030304153127.GG37397@procyon.firepipe.net>; from will@csociety.org on Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:31:27AM -0800 References: <20030304153127.GG37397@procyon.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:31:27AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: > Anyone know if maybe the dump format has been changed to the > extent that it breaks Amanda or something? In fact, based on the > "64+0" it appears that the header or something similar may have > been broken. I've seen reports that dump compatability was broken. I'm dumping two 5.0 boxes and one 4-STABLE box to one of the 5.0 boxes and the amverify I'm current running doesn't seem to have any problem. Thus, I'd tend to suspect we need to fix restore in 4.x. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+ZQTgXY6L6fI4GtQRArASAKCgjZ9gMbo+N90OVQ67xJETB34/QgCfdcc9 +ZXXCA/TB40tg0QmSDF5f8Y= =X8VE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030304115734.A23126>